Articles by "Law Education India"

 How to Draft Commercial Contract?

Following explains everything about contract drafting in India:


What does it mean to enter into a contract?

When you sign the contract, you write down the terms of the contract. A contract is a legally binding agreement between the parties. The document describes the rights and obligations governed by the contract. Although you can enter into a contract through written or oral agreements, contract drafting usually refers to written contracts. The parties may go through various proposals and negotiate several times before concluding a contract. The purpose of creating a contract is to create a legally binding document that is as close as possible to all interested parties, so that the document is concise and clear.

Terms and Conditions

While the details of each individual contract vary, when drafting a contract it must include some important information in order to be valid and legally binding. First, any contract must have competent parties as part of the agreement with a mentally retarded person or a minor who cannot legally sign a valid contract. The document itself must then have:

·         Lawful Object

·         Consideration

·         Offer

·         Acceptance

A contract must include a valid offer and acceptance between the parties to be legally binding. E.g. a machine sale includes one party selling the machine and the other party agreeing to buy it, and hence mutual assent.

 

Infographics on Drafting of Commercial contract

Consideration

A contract must include adequate consideration to be enforceable. E.g. In employment contracts, one party agrees to complete job duties while the other agrees to pay a specified amount.

Consideration is a bargained-for promise. The promise cannot be illegal, nor can it be something a party is legally obligated to do already. Instances of consideration include:

  • Action
  • Money
  • Property, including intellectual property

 

Legality

You also must consider legality when you draft a contract. Legality is whether a contract meets all jurisdictional requirements. For instance, a provision of a contract may be legal in one state and not another.

What is a Draft Contract / Contract Draft?

A draft contract is just draft of an agreement that has not final yet. The parties have not yet agreed on the exact terms and wording used in the draft.


How to Draft a Contract?

Creating an effective contract requires a multi-step process. The most important steps include:

1.    Determine if all parties can participate: All parties to the agreement must be considered capable of making the contract valid. You cannot force or coerce anyone to sign a contract. In most situations, the parties must be over 18 years of age to enter into a contract. The parties to the contract must always be mentally healthy when signing the contract, even under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

2.    Establish the terms of the contract: The terms of the contract should ensure that both parties achieve the desired outcome of the agreement. You should make an agreement in good faith, not attempt a scam. It is best to put the terms of the contract in writing, not verbally. Having a written record of the contract can make it easier to enforce that contract.

3.    Specify consideration: For a contract to be effective, you must clearly state the elements of consideration. Remember that consideration is the exchange of an item such as intellectual property, services, goods, or a promise to exchange compensation. A contract cannot exist without consideration.

4.    Decide if you want to use a confidentiality clause: Confidentiality agreements are useful if your contract contains trade secrets or other confidential information. By including a confidentiality clause, you can ensure that sensitive information remains secure. Anyone who violates a nondisclosure agreement is considered a breach of contract.

5.    Include a Dispute Resolution Clause: A dispute resolution clause describes how the parties will deal with a breach of contract. This may include the party responsible for paying attorneys' fees and whether the parties resort to arbitration or litigation. If the parties choose to litigate, this clause must also include the jurisdiction in which the breach is to be resolved.

6.    Include a termination clause: When signing the contract, state the length of the contract. Your contract should also include any steps either party can take that lead to early termination. Contracts for ongoing services may also contain a provision that allows prior notice without reason. Thirty days notice as usual.

7.    Ensure that the contract complies with all applicable laws: You must ensure that your contract is drafted in accordance with all applicable laws. If you don't, your contract will end up being unenforceable. You can include the jurisdiction your contract should be interpreted in to make this clear.

Ensure the contract follows industry and other specific requirements: Many contracts also require additional clauses pertaining to the specific business or personal situations the contract covers.

8.    Offer the contract for acceptance: After you write the contract, you need to offer it to the other party for consideration. The other party can accept the contract as is and proceed to the final step of signing. If they don't accept the contract, they can make a counter offer instead.

9.    Negotiate the terms of the contract: If the other party makes a counteroffer to your original proposal, you can accept that counteroffer or provide your own counteroffer in return. These exchanges of offers can go on and on until both parties agree on everything. Be sure to review the contract after each counteroffer to make sure you understand any changes made.

10.                       Signing the contract: Once both parties have agreed on the final offer, the parties must sign and date the document. The contract can only be legally binding at this point. Both parties must obtain a copy of the contract to keep for their records.

Remember that when drafting the contract, you must reserve the last page of the contract for signature and date.

The contract is not considered effective unless signed and dated by both parties. In addition, both parties must understand all the details before signing the contract.

If either party does not understand a part of the contract, they should consult an attorney before signing.

Contracts usually contain specific legal terms, so it is also important to include all relevant clauses and required verbatim.

 

Other common terms & conditions include:

  • Force majeure
  • Indemnification
  • Warranties
  • Liquidated damages clauses
  • Time is of the essence clauses
  • Choice of law and forum selection

 

Why Should You Draft a Contract?

Even if you enter into a simple agreement, it is usually in your best interest to have a written contract. Although an oral technical agreement is as enforceable as a written contract, it is more difficult (and therefore more expensive) to prove that an oral contract exists. Thus, a written agreement is less risky than an oral agreement because it creates a document that clearly specifies the obligations and rights of both parties in the event of a mistake or a crime.

Requirements for written contracts may vary depending on the state in which you live or do business, and different types of contracts also require different formalities. 

Working with a qualified attorney before drafting a contract will help ensure that your contract contains all the necessary clauses, terms, and details required by your jurisdiction, industry, etc.

 

Why should I register a contract?

Currently, in many countries around the world, laws do not explicitly state that all contracts must be registered in order to be legally enforceable and identifiable; however, if one party is the victim of default by the other party/parties, it may be more tedious for the victim to prove the legality, binding and validity of the contract. 

In addition, there are also applications of different laws on the same subject, which can cause confusion if contracts need to be registered differently.

 

For example, in India, the Indian Contract Act 1872 states that all agreements, oral or written, are valid if and when:

created with the free consent of the parties to such contract;

the consideration in question has a legal nature

concerns a legal matter.

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 mentions the registration or stamping of any contract. However, the provisions of the Registration Act 1908 list the documents that must be registered in order to be legally identifiable and enforceable by a court. These include: deeds relating to immovable property (deed of sale, lease, deed of gift). certificate etc.), movable property instruments worth Rs. 100 or more and so on.

Moreover, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 clearly states that documents like power of attorney (other than power of attorney to sell immovable property), development agreement etc. must be executed on a paper stamp but not registered for it. be legally enforceable.

Such a provision creates a kind of ambiguity as to what types of contracts require mandatory registration or are not required to be legally enforceable in the eyes of the law. It is therefore recommended that the parties register their contracts if they are to avoid ambiguous and unnecessary difficulties and/or losses and/or costs of litigation that may arise in the long run.

The person reviewing the contract must also understand the importance of contract registration. If the review of the contract is done by pre-registration, then one needs to understand the importance of each clause and how changing/altering undesirable terms can save the parties a lot of inconvenience and expense.

 If the review occurs after registration, it will help the reviewer understand the weight of the clauses attached to the contract and how the clauses will affect both parties, especially under situation of dispute.

Infographics on the Basic Process of Contract Drafting

 

What is the Basic Process of Contract Drafting?

Firstly, the person drafting/reviewing the contract must attain the knowledge of the purpose of making the contract.

One must understand what the subject and object of the contract is and what is the role played by the parties in achieving the desired subject/object.

The contract must include the right and duties that the parties to the contract have in relation to one another. Each of the parties is there to fulfill a particular purpose and such purpose and role must be easily and clearly understood while drafting as well as reviewing the contract.

 

Secondly, the feasibility of the contract must be kept in mind - whether the terms and conditions given in the contract are capable of being carried out; whether the parties to the contract are capable of executing their rights and duties; which party/parties gain most and which one takes upon most of the liability during the tenure of the contract; et cetera. Such questions need to be answered in order to determine the feasibility of a contract.

 

Thirdly, one must be able to predict the issues and/or problems and/or disputes that may arise out of the contract in future scenarios. The person drafting as well as the person reviewing the contract must be able to understand what terms and clauses may give rise to a risk which may cause disputes and/or losses between the parties in the future. 

t must also be understood which clauses hold the loopholes in the contract and the possible permutation of ways in which such loopholes may later be exploited by the parties to the contract (Boilerplate clauses are often used to cleverly create and cover such loopholes).

 

What are the Terms and Clauses in Contract?

There are certain basic terms and clauses that are very general and basic in nature. Such clauses form a part of every type of contract document.

 

The following are a few of such clauses:

   1.    Subject and its Legality: The 1st and foremost point to begin the drafting of an agreement is to determine the subject of the contract is. The subject of the contract will determine its nature. The subject will also determine if the contract will be legally enforceable or not.

While reviewing an agreement, this is the first point that one must look at. Many cases are lost and won simply by stating that the subject to a contract is not considered to be legal in the eyes of the prevalent laws.

 

   2.    Definition Clause: Each and every contract must copntain definition clause. Such clause contains all the definitions to various words that are used throughout the contract, aka glossary. Certain words holding a general meaning may be usable throughout the contract, but the contract may contain a definition of such word which might describe the meaning of such word specifically in relation to the specific contract. In such case, no different meaning of the word will be accepted as the word has been specifically stated and agreed upon by the parties to the contract and, as such, and binding on them.

 

   3.    Tenure of the Contract: Contracts are generally made for a specific time period, no matter how long the time frame it is. The term consists of a specifically stated time period during which the relationship between the parties will be governed by the terms of such contract. Once the time period expires, the contract also automatically expires.

     In many cases, the duration of contract also depends on the achieving of a certain goal for which the contract is being entered into.

     For e.g.: A and B enter into a contract that will last for such time as it takes for them to reach place X, once they will reach the place X the contract between them will expire.


   4.    Clause for Renewal of the Contract: Such clauses are inserted to relinquish the need to make different contracts from time to time. If the nature of the work and the terms stipulated in the contract is not required to be changed for a long period of time. A renewal clause can be inserted to ensure continual binding effect of the contract without incurring the expenses of drafting and registering different contracts over and over again. This also eliminates the time lag that may be caused due to waiting period until the fresh contract document is created. Such clauses are often included in the clause describing the term of the contract.

 

   5.    Consideration Amount and Legality: Another important clause in a contract is the clause stating the amount or the type of consideration. It states the consideration amount that one or more parties must pay to the other party / parties for services rendered done or goods produced by the latter ones.

 

   6.    Such consideration must always be legal in nature: The consideration must be paid through an instrument or object that is legally recognized by the law in force. A consideration paid through an illegal object will render the entire contract to be void and have no legal enforceability.

 

   7.    Inspection of products and goods: This clause helps the parties to safeguard themselves from cases of fraud or misrepresentation which may arise due to insufficient quality of products and goods so delivered. This allows the purchaser to inspect every good so as to be sure that the good so received are of such quality as had been agreed between them.

On the other hand, it also provides a safety net to the selling party because once the quality of the good is inspected and accepted, the purchaser cannot hold the seller liable for any quality-related issues in the future.


   8.    Return/refund: This clause describes all the circumstances and scenarios in which the parties are entitled to return of the product and/or receive refund of the consideration paid for such product. This is generally used in contracts of sale of movable properties.


   9.    Terms related to cancellation of the contract: These are clauses which record the circumstances under which the contract shall stand cancelled. It generally includes certain acts that the parties are barred from and in violation of such a term, the cancellation clause will be invoked and the contract will be cancelled. It also includes the rights and liabilities that the parties of the contract will be entitled to when the contract stands cancelled.

 

   10.                       Rights and duties of the parties: Every contract must mandatorily include the clauses that enumerate the rights and duties of the parties in respect to one another. These clauses form the crux of every contract and violation of these clauses generally forms the core to the disputes that arise between the parties to the contract.

Each and every right and obligation of the parties must be specifically stated with as much detail as possible to avoid any ambiguity or vagueness whatsoever.

 

 

   11.                       Force majeure: Under the Contract laws, force majeure refers to all such unforeseeable and unpredictable scenarios and circumstances which may stop one from executing his/her duty, thereby leaving the contract unfulfilled. Force majeure clauses talk about various contingencies, including but not limited to the acts of God, and what shall be the role of such parties when such a situation may arise during the tenure of the contract.

This clause is often overlooked during the process of drafting and reviewing, nevertheless, it is as important a clause as any other as it details the sharing of expenses and costs that are incurred during the time of contingencies.


   12.                       Delegation and liability: This clause is mostly found in contracts and agreements related to manufacture and sale of movable products. The clause states what kind of work can be delegated by the parties to other third and/or unknown parties to the contract and who may be held liable for any dispute that may arise due to insufficiency or inefficiency of products and/or services provided by such third party.

 

   13.                       Payments of expenses: This clause states how the expenses incurred by virtue of the contract and throughout the tenure of the contract, shall be paid for. It states in what proportion the parties to the contract may share the expenses so incurred and what may be the mode of such payments.


   14.                       Compensation: The compensation clause states the amount with which one must compensate another for the actions/omissions/defaults done by the former which has resulted in some sort of loss (financial, physical or mental) to the latter.

   15.                       Profit sharing: Once the expenses are paid for, it is time for sharing of the profit that has been gained by virtue of the contract. The profit sharing clause states the proportion in which the profit will be shared by the parties and how a part of such profit may be used for other purposes as agreed between the parties.

   16.                       Dispute settlement and jurisdiction: This is also an important clause that one must never forget to draft and review. This clause decides as to what mode of dispute resolution or what legal recourse will be taken by the parties to the contract when a dispute arises in between the parties. In the current world almost every contract contains this clause and most of them opt for alternative dispute resolution system like arbitration, mediation, etc. to solve disputes.

Another clause which is generally included in the dispute settlement clause is the clause describing the jurisdiction in which any dispute will be resolved.

For example, many multi-national companies include a jurisdiction clause stating that any case which involves litigation may only be filed against the company in a specific city, town or area.

This clause is not seen so often in contracts that had been drafted up until a few decades ago. However, in the current system we will find compensation clauses in most of the contracts that come to us. Consumers of services and products often invoke the compensation clause on various grounds and are often awarded large sums as compensation amounts by the Courts and/or tribunal, whatever the case may be.

 

Conclusion

These are small areas that are important to creating a good contract. The inclusion of the above terms will give the reader a detailed idea of ​​what is to be achieved in the contract and what the relationship between the parties is.

In addition, any dispute between the parties can be effectively resolved if the provisions set forth herein are included in the contract. The result of all these efforts is a contract that saves a lot of time, effort and expense that would otherwise be possible.

In addition, reviewing drafted contracts is just as important as writing them. If the contract is not reviewed, the signatory party or parties may be exposed to the risk of proving terms and conditions that may be disadvantageous to them and may cause financial or emotional harm in the future.


 

DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY OF CONTRACT

Privity means privacy, which here refers to private between the parties to contract.

Essentials of privity to contract application or claim:

1.      Contract entered into between 2 parties: Most importantly there must be a contract between 2 or more parties

2.      Parties must be competent and there should be a valid consideration: Competency of parties and the existence of consideration are pre-requisites for application of this doctrine

3.      There has been a breach of contract by at least 1 party: Breach of contract by one Party is the essential requirement for the application of the doctrine of privity of contract.

4.      Only parties to contract can sue each other: After the breach, only Parties to a contract are entitled to sue against each other for non-performance of the contract.

 

 

Doctrine of Privity under Indian Contract Act 1972

  Ø  Sec. 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation to the party, by the party breaching the contract

  Ø  In sec. 73 it appears that compensation arises for actual damages caused due to non performance of the contract and not indirect damages. Here only pecuniary damages are taken into account.

  Ø  In estimating the loss arising from the breach of contract, the means of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of contract must be considered

  Ø  Sec. 73 states, In estimating the loss arising for breach of contract inconvenience caused by non performance of contract must be considered

Graphical representation of privity of contract


Exceptions to Privity of Contract

There are, certain exceptions to the rule of privity of contract recognized both by the English Law and the Indian Law, under which a person, who is not a party to a contract can sue on it. The exceptions to the rule are:

1. Trust or Charge

Sometimes under contract, a benefit is given to a person who is not a party to the contract. This benefit can be given by creating a Trust or Charge in favour of such person. In such cases, the beneficiary under the trust or charge may enforce the contract even though he is not a party to it.

2. Marriage Settlement, Partition or Other Family Arrangements

In an agreement made in connection with marriage, partition or other family arrangements, a person, for whose benefit the provision is made, can enforce the agreement though he is not a party to it.

3. Acknowledgement of Payment

If a party acknowledges the payment to the third person or constitutes himself as an agent of that third person, then the third person can recover the amount from such a party.

4. Agreements Affecting the Land

If such land is purchased by somebody with the notice of rights and obligations of the owner, then those rights and obligations shall bind the purchaser although he was not a party to the agreement.

5. Agency

A principal, even if concealed, may sue on a contract made by an agent. The third party cannot plead that there was no contract between him and the principal.

6. Assignment

The assignee of a debt or an actionable claim may sue the original debtor if the assignment is a legal one.

7. Holder in Due Course

A holder in due course of a negotiable instrument is one who has obtained the negotiable instrument in good faith and for valuable consideration. He can sue prior parties to the negotiable instrument.

8. Fund in Hands of a Party

Where a fund is created in the hands of one of the contracting parties in favor of a third party, it may be possible to give the latter, a remedy in quasi-contract on the grounds that to allow the contracting party to keep the fund would be to allow unjust enrichment.

As a general rule, both Indian and English law are similar to each other that only parties to contract can sue each other. In a leading English case of Tweddle v. Atkinson, it was held that the plaintiff cannot sue as he was both a stranger to the contract as well stranger to consideration. This concept of privity of contract was again analyzed in the case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co.Ltd v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd.

 

Infographics on privity of contract


Exceptions to Privity of Contract

    ·         Benefit Aspect of Contract

    ·         Burden Aspect of Contract

    ·         Doctrine of Privity under Law of Agency


Benefit Aspect of Contract

ü  A person stranger to contract cannot enforce the contract except some exceptions defined in court rulings or previous cases.

ü  2 basic court ruled exceptions where a stranger to contract can sue the other party / parties are:

o   Beneficiary/beneficiaries under the contract towards who contract creates trust

o   Beneficiary/beneficiaries under the contract which is a part of family arrangement

           

Burden Aspect of Contract

1.      Burden of contract stands for liability of obligation created by the contract

2.      A contract gives right to a party/parties and assigns duty to other party/ parties

 

Doctrine of Privity under Agency (Exceptions)

1.      The principal-agent relationship is named as ‘agency’. Also, the agent does the agency work by representing the principal toward other parties.

2.      The principal, as well as the agent in their capacity have certain rights and duties towards other parties directly attributable to the acts of his agent or the agency

3.      In most cases specific to agency despite the agents fault it is treated as that of the principal and the principal is liable towards other parties acts and omissions of his agent 


What is the Position of Privity of Consideration in India?

This principle of the doctrine of privity of consideration is not applicable in India. As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872 the definition of consideration in Section 2(d) states, consideration may be furnished by ‘the promisee or any other person’ as long as it is ‘at the desire of promisor’. Thus, the consideration may move from promisee, or some other person, if the promisor has no objection, from any other person. The leading authority, in this case, is the case of Venkata Chinnaya v. VenkataramayaGaru.[1881 Madras HC].

  

Position of Privity of Contract in Indian Law

In India, the apex court has by its decision in MC Chacko vs. State of Travancore (1970SC) in a far reaching attempt of clearing the ambiguities in the application of the Doctrine of Privity held that a person not a party to a contract cannot subject to certain well recognized exceptions, enforce the terms of the contract. The recognized exception mentioned in the quoted judgment is worded widely so as to cover the beneficiaries under the terms of the contract. Views on the rights of third party beneficiaries have been laid down by other courts of India. For instance in:

1.  Bhujendra Nath vs. Sushamoyee Basu ( Calcutta HC in 1936), the division bench of the Calcutta High Court has held that a stranger to a contract which is to his benefit is entitled to enforce the agreement to his benefit. Also, in Pandurang vs. Vishwanath (1939), it has been held the person beneficially entitled under the contract can sue even though not a party to the contract itself.

2. Chinnaya v. Rammya (Madras HC in 1987), a lady granted her daughter some land via registered gift deed one of the terms that she will pay an annual sum to her maternal aunt after her death which she defaulted and denied payment invoking privity of contract i.e. claiming that her aunt was not a party to contract. In this case though the consideration was paid by the mother (vide sec. 2D of Indian Contract Act 1872) and not aunt so the uncle is stranger to consideration, along with stranger to contract. Yet his suit was allowed as he was a beneficiary of the contract under law. As the consideration may be given by the promise or anyone of their behalf, here, the consideration to the daughter was given by her mother on behalf of her aunt.

 

Stranger to Consideration

In context of Indian law, as long as there is consideration for promise, it does not matter who furnishes the consideration. Which means in Indian law doctrine of Privity of Consideration does not apply. It can be clarified by the words given under Section 2(d) of Indian Contract Act, 1862. It states that, when, at the desire of the promisor, the promise or any other person. This concept has been confirmed by the then judicial system in the case of Kedarnath Bhattacharji v Gorie Mohammad (1887)

 

Stranger to Contract

The doctrine of privity of a contract is a common law principle which implies that only parties to a contract are allowed to sue each other to enforce their rights and liabilities and no stranger is allowed to confer obligations upon any person who is not a party to contract even though contract the contract have been entered into for his benefit.

 

Position of Privity of Contract in English law

In a leading English case of Tweddle v. Atkinson[1861], it was held that the plaintiff cannot sue as he was both a stranger to the contract as well stranger to consideration. This concept of privity of contract was again analyzed in the case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co.Ltd v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd. Where there was an agreement between a Dunlop dealer and a subdealer. Here Dunlop could not sue as it was stranger to contract[1915]


There are, certain exceptions to the rule of privity of contract recognized both by the English Law and the Indian Law, under which a person, who is not a party to a contract can sue on it. Some exceptions to the rule pertaining to some circumstances under the following:

1. Trust or Charge

Sometimes under contract, a benefit is given to a person who is not a party to the contract. This benefit can be given by creating a Trust or Charge in favour of such person. In such cases, the beneficiary under the trust or charge may enforce the contract even though he is not a party to it.

2. Marriage Settlement, Partition or Other Family Arrangements

In an agreement made in connection with marriage, partition or other family arrangements, a person, for whose benefit the provision is made, can enforce the agreement though he is not a party to it.

3. Acknowledgement of Payment

If a party acknowledges the payment to the third person or constitutes himself as an agent of that third person, then the third person can recover the amount from such a party.

4. Agreements Affecting the Land

If such land is purchased by somebody with the notice of rights and obligations of the owner, then those rights and obligations shall bind the purchaser although he was not a party to the agreement.

5. Agency

A principal, even if concealed, may sue on a contract made by an agent. The third party cannot plead that there was no contract between him and the principal.

6. Assignment

The assignee of a debt or an actionable claim may sue the original debtor if the assignment is a legal one.

7. Holder in Due Course

A holder in due course of a negotiable instrument is one who has obtained the negotiable instrument in good faith and for valuable consideration. He can sue prior parties to the negotiable instrument.

8. Fund in Hands of a party

Where a fund is created in the hands of one of the contracting parties in favor of a third party, it may be possible to give the latter, a remedy in quasi-contract on the grounds that to allow the contracting party to keep the fund would be to allow unjust enrichment.

As a general rule, both Indian and English law are similar to each other that only parties to contract can sue each other. In a leading English case of Tweddle v. Atkinson, it was held that the plaintiff cannot sue as he was both a stranger to the contract as well stranger to consideration. This concept of privity of contract was again analyzed in the case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co.Ltd v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd.


Lawruling

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget